On August 5, 2025, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas issued a pivotal ruling that temporarily blocks the enforcement of a new Arkansas law mandating the display of the Ten Commandments in public schools and government buildings. The decision marks a key moment in the ongoing national debate over the role of religion in publicly funded institutions and reaffirms judicial oversight in upholding the constitutional separation of church and state.
The law in question, known as Act 573, was passed by the Arkansas Legislature and signed into law by Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders earlier in April. It required all public K-12 schools, libraries, colleges, and government buildings in the state to display a framed or poster-sized copy of the Ten Commandments. The displays, according to the law, were to be at least 16 by 20 inches in size and placed in a prominent location where students and visitors could view them daily. The law allowed for private donations to cover the cost of the posters, though state funds could be used to replace or standardize displays that did not meet specifications.
Read also: https://nyreview.com/trump-administration-cuts-federal-funding-to-harvard-over-alleged-antisemitism/
The law immediately faced legal pushback. In June, a group of Arkansas parents and guardians from multiple religious and nonreligious backgrounds filed a lawsuit challenging the law’s constitutionality. The plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, argued that Act 573 violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, specifically the Establishment Clause, which prohibits the government from endorsing a particular religion.
The plaintiffs included Jewish, Unitarian Universalist, Humanist, atheist, and secular families who contended that the mandated displays promoted a religious message incompatible with their personal beliefs and created a divisive and coercive atmosphere in public schools. One of the lead plaintiffs, Samantha Stinson, an Orthodox Jewish mother, voiced concern that the law not only contradicted her religious values but also signaled to her children that their faith was less valid in the public square.
U.S. District Judge Timothy L. Brooks, presiding over the case, issued a preliminary injunction that prevents Act 573 from taking effect in the four school districts where the plaintiffs reside: Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville, and Siloam Springs. Though the injunction applies only to these districts for now, it represents a significant legal blow to the broader implementation of the law and signals judicial skepticism about its constitutionality.
In his 35-page ruling, Judge Brooks drew heavily on legal precedent, particularly the 1980 Supreme Court case Stone v. Graham, which invalidated a similar Kentucky law requiring the Ten Commandments to be posted in classrooms. Brooks concluded that the Arkansas law lacked a clear secular purpose and appeared to be part of a coordinated effort across multiple states to inject religious doctrine into public education. He emphasized that government actions must remain neutral on matters of faith, particularly in settings as influential as public schools.
Supporters of the law, including Governor Sanders and several state legislators, defended Act 573 as an acknowledgment of the historical and moral influence of the Ten Commandments on Western legal traditions. They argued that the displays served an educational and cultural purpose, rather than a religious one, and could help instill a sense of civic virtue and responsibility among students.
Despite those claims, legal scholars and civil rights advocates have expressed concern about the increasing number of similar laws passed in conservative-leaning states. Several other states, including Louisiana and Texas, have introduced or passed legislation requiring religious texts or symbols in public institutions, sparking a wave of legal challenges across the country. In Louisiana, a similar Ten Commandments law was recently struck down by a federal court and is now under appellate review. Legal experts believe that these challenges may eventually escalate to the U.S. Supreme Court, which could issue a definitive ruling on the matter in the coming years.
In Arkansas, the ruling has both immediate and long-term implications. As the new school year begins, the four districts covered by the injunction will not be required to post the Ten Commandments, sparing educators and administrators from potentially divisive decisions. Meanwhile, the Arkansas Attorney General’s office is reviewing the ruling and considering whether to appeal the decision to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
For now, Judge Brooks’s injunction stands as a reminder of the enduring importance of First Amendment protections and the careful line that public institutions must walk when religion and education intersect. As similar laws continue to appear across the United States, federal courts are poised to play a decisive role in maintaining the boundaries between personal belief and public policy.
